Legion (
forwearemany) wrote in
lifenet2019-03-10 07:11 pm
Entry tags:
- final fantasy ix: zidane tribal,
- mass effect: legion,
- mushi-shi: ginko,
- red vs. blue: agent washington,
- resident evil: albert wesker,
- undertale: asgore dreemurr,
- ✖ ffxv: prompto argentum,
- ✖ guilty gear: faust,
- ✖ kamen rider: sakuya tachibana,
- ✖ original: nari reno,
- ✖ persona 5: yusuke kitagawa,
- ✖ undertale: muffet
Farspeech stones
(It's an abrupt decision to voice the question that has been plaguing their thoughts over the stones.)
How is synthetic life treated in your universe of origin?
How is synthetic life treated in your universe of origin?

no subject
Previously, you spoke of torture.
no subject
[The word is heavy with a weight he doesn't know how to name.]
That was technically illegal. It's hard to say if that had to do with morality so much as it did...resources. Smart A.I. in particular are considered important military property.
They're not exactly well understood. The laws regarding military A.I. are still being written. [Though the fate of the Alpha A.I. had some real fucking repercussions.]
no subject
(They go quiet.)
no subject
[The War changed people's priorities. Anything to win the War, after a while - consequences and the law be damned.]
no subject
(Are people at least punished for abusing A.I.?)
no subject
So what happens when you're torturing something that's essentially another version of you?
Can a committee really punish you for that?
[It was that hypothetical that the Director was banking on.]
no subject
(In other words: bullshit.)
Perhaps the person in question should inflict torture directly on themself, if that is what is desired.
no subject
[He wasn't happy about that either. But really, nobody was.]
The only thing that more intensive strictures have managed so far is to make it harder to legally acquire an A.I. in the first place.
no subject
Bullshit.
(Those A.I. laws sound terrible, Wash. Your universe sounds terrible.)
no subject
[He sounds tired.]
It doesn't help that most Smart A.I., they...well, it's a maximum of seven years before they're decommissioned. If that.
no subject
(The let out a long stream of chatter.)
Seven years?
no subject
But...yeah. Smart A.I. units are - well, they're the most intelligent. They're capable of adaptability, creative thought. Functionally, they're almost indistinguishable from your average human. They have personality matrices. They're people.
It's just that the longer they're active, the more data they gather, and the more likely it is that they'll go rampant.
no subject
no subject
But a Smart A.I. is made to constantly develop and expand - until it starts to outgrow the space it's been allotted. You get feedback loops, you get the loss of vital functions...you get a lot of science that I'm not the right person to explain or understand.
They call it...thinking themselves to death.
no subject
no subject
[It's a kinder word than "insane." But maybe not quite as honest.]
The seven year time frame isn't a hard limit. It's just the estimation of how long it takes before the A.I. just...degrades to the point where it can't sustain itself.
no subject
A shorter life is not necessarily a less worthy one.
(Galactic society in their universe was founded by the cooperative efforts of a species that lives for 1,000 years and one that doesn't make it past 30.)
no subject
[Think of Alpha - of Church, who's here, impossibly, post-E.M.P. and furious and flailing and a hypocrite and just as prone to sporadic bursts of screeching outrage and a broken shell of a fragmented personality wrapped in half-memories wrapped in barbed wire wrapped in arsenic.]
[Then don't.]
They're protected as military assets. Not as people.
Like you said. Bullshit.
no subject
(If Wash could see Legion, he would see their flaps rippling.)
There are others here like us. Abuse appears near ubiquitous among synthetics that have contact with organic life, regardless of lifespan, method of construction, intended purpose, or materials.
no subject
[One of the great capacities of humanity and its many related species: to categorize others into an arbitrary tier that designates them lesser.]
It doesn't surprise me that it is.
no subject
no subject
Sorry, buddy. I'm not sure if you were hoping for better answers than that.
no subject
(Legion is in a bad place.)
no subject
[Is there anyone that he needs to straighten out.]
no subject
(Unfortunately no. Legion's increasing distress isn't because anyone is abusing them.
It just shows up in an increasing focus on such horrors.)
Thank you.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)